san francisco superior court law and motion

) Therefore, the Court cannot find that UPA has waived their objections. ) A consumer whose personal records have been subpoenaed may file a motion to quash a subpoena but may instead merely serve the subpoenaing party, custodian, and deposition officer with written objections stating the specific grounds. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT F. Ninth Cause of Action - Negligent Supervision. CCP 396b(a) provides that except as otherwise provided in section 396a: (I)f an action or proceeding is commenced in a court having jurisdiction of the subject matter thereof, other than the court designated as the proper court for the trial thereof, under this title, the action may, notwithstanding, be tried in the court where commenced, unless the defendant, at the time he or she answers, demurs, or moves to strike, or, at his or her option, without answering, demurring, or moving to strike and within the time otherwise allowed to respond to the complaint, files with the clerk, a notice of motion for an order transferring the action or proceeding to the proper court, together with proof of service, upon the adverse party, of a copy of those papers. Therefore, the demur to the ninth cause of action is OVERRULED. ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 3, 2023 Before filing a demurrer, the demurring or moving party is required to meet and confer with the party who filed the pleading demurred to for the purposes of determining whether an agreement can be reached through a filing of an amended pleading that would resolve the objections to be raised in the demurrer. ) ) 5 ) Unverified responses are tantamount to no responses at all. 9 VELJON JEANELLE COMBS, ) Department: 403 ) 5 ) ) ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM Local Rule 8.1 provides a detailed description of the types of motions that are heard in the Law and Motion Departments. Given that petition was filed in Fresno Superior Court, all subsequent CAA petitions to determine any subsequent petition involving the same agreement to arbitrate and the same controversy belong in that court. Writs of Administrative Mandamus in Other Superior Courts. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 22, 2022 Family Law Facilitator Office Rules (Prepared by the Superior Court of California, County of San Bernardino) A Guide for volunteers and interns (Prepared by the Legal Aid Foundation of Santa Barbara County.) 10 COLETTE WHORISKEY, ) Department: 404 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT Huh v. Wang(2007) 158 Cal.App.4th 1406, 1423. (Chan) (1997) 57 CA4th 1546, 1551, 67 CR2d 804, 807 (disapproved on other grounds by Wilcox v. Birtwhistle (1999) 21 Cal.4th 973, 982, fn. 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER OF CHILD CUSTODY; REQUEST FOR O 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) ) ) ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES Severe emotional distress [is] emotional distress of such substantial quantity or enduring quality that no reasonable man in a civilized society should be expected to endure it. (Fletcher v. Western Life Insurance Co. (1970) 10 Cal.App.3d 376, 397; see alsoCACI 1600.). Plaintiff Anita Florke (Plaintiff) filed the complaint against defendant San Francisco North/Petaluma KOA (SFPKOA) in Petaluma, she fell and suffered injuries as a result of a dangerous condition which Defendant negligently allowed or caused. 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER FOR CHANGE OF CHILD 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 22, 2022 Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. ) It is first worth noting that Defendants memorandum of points and authorities requests to strike surplusage from multiple paragraphs, but this request is not enumerated as required under California Rule of Court, Rule 3.1322. ) ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 17, 2023 Failure to verify responses is equivalent to serving no responses at all. ) 5 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA An ex parte hearing is urgent and is requested by one party with short notice to the opposing party. You must serve the other party or their lawyer with a copy of your motion. ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA 5 ) 5 CRC 3.1304(c) and (d) (amended eff 1/1/16) > > Read More.. NEW RULE AMENDMENTS EFFECTIVE APRIL 1 . Superior Court of California San Francisco Timing 10 Days After Service of Notice > > Read More.. Cut-Off Date. ) (1993) 18 Cal.App.4th 919, 933; see also Britt v. Sup.Ct. If in electronic form, the authority must be electronically bookmarked as required by rule 3.1110(f)(4). ) ) Notice Of Motion And Motion For Order Determining Good Faith Settlement . ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES It is worth noting that Defendants reply asserting this point was also late, filed only four court days prior to hearing. ) A mistake in the name of a party is considered a clerical error that the court can amend. ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT The only issue involved in a demurrer hearing is whether the complaint, as it stands, unconnected with extraneous matters, states a cause of action. (Hahn v. Mirda (2007) 147 Cal.App.4th 740, 747.) ) ) Co. (2004) 116 Cal.App.4th 968, 994.) In a demurrer proceeding, the defects must be apparent on the face of the pleading or via proper judicial notice. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 9 RACHEL M KONIUK, ) Department: 403 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 27, 2022 ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 9 ANNE DOLLARD, ) Department: 404 6 CHITRA AKILESWARAN, ) Case Number: FDI-20-793853 ), As to negligence, in Flowers v. Torrance Memorial Hospital Medical Center (1994) 8 Cal.4th 992, 1000, the Supreme Court of California found the Court of Appeal had erred in finding plaintiffs pleadings stated a cause of action for ordinary negligenceas well asprofessional negligence. However, this tentative ruling information is usually taken down from the court's website after several days or weeks. 6 MICHAEL JOHN NAPOLITANA, ) Case Number: FDI-18-790530 11 ) ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA ) ) 11 ) 9 RYAN KIR, ) Department: 403 (See Donabedian v. Mercury Ins. 11 ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES ) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: SPOUSAL OR PARTNER S 3 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: WITHDRAWAL OF APPEARANCE, 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) Commodore Home Systems, Inc. v. Sup. ) The opposition and the reply both merit consideration. (Subd (g) amended and lettered effective January 1, 2007; adopted as part of subd (d); previously amended and relettered as subd (e) effective January 1, 2004.). 5 ) ) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: ATTORNEY FEES AND COSTS, 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 22, 2022 5 6 DOUGLAS ELVIRA-CHILIN, ) Case Number: FDI-22-796115 ) The Court particularly noted that Ms. Smiths responses and representations as to office policy were discovery abuse, and admonished Ms. Smith on the record. ) 6 CHRISTOPHER JAMES RIVERS, ) Case Number: FMS-17-387056 Pro. Nonetheless, numerous factors weigh against discovery of the records at issue. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 9 LLANCARLO ROMO(BOLANOS), ) Department: 403 ) 6 ) Moreover, both Plaintiff and Joe describe the conditions, a combination of age, pre-diabetes, and high blood pressure. 11 ) 9 VADIM V NISENBAUM, ) Department: 404 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) Allen v. Sup.Ct. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: JUDITH HARDING 6 WYNTER HICKS, ) Case Number: FDV-22-816138 File & ServeXpress has been providing electronic filing and service in San Francisco Superior Court cases since 1998. . 11 ) ) If a party fails serve a timely response, the court shall impose sanctions unless it finds that the party subject to the sanction acted with substantial justification or that other circumstances make the imposition of the sanction unjust. This defect is capable of remedy through amendment. The purpose of monetary sanctions is to mitigate the effects of the necessity of discovery motions and responses on the prevailing party. Dept. ) I like all the marble too. ) See Appleton v. Superior Court (1988) 206 Cal.App.3d 632, 635,636. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM Defendant has not been named as a defendant in the FAC in this capacity, and to the degree that the default names him as an individual, it is void. ) 6 JACQUELINE M SCHLIFKE, ) Case Number: FDI-15-783643 Also, Sacramento County Superior Court judges are routinely asked to enter judgments challenging actions by the State of California and its agencies. G. Seventh, Eighth, and Tenth Causes of Action - Wage Loss, Loss of Earning Capacity, and Possible Diminution of Life Span, SRMH asserts the causes of action for Wage Loss, Loss of Earning Capacity, and Possible Diminution of Life Span should fail because they are not causes of action but rather damages. ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES 11 ) Com. ) B. The previous tentative ruling was as follows: Motion to Compel Production of Medical Records Pursuant to Subpoena DENIED. If you are unable to find your San Francisco Family Law dissolution case online, please contact Client Support at 888-529-7587. ) There is a fee payable for the motion at the time of filing, unless you have a waiver of fee on file. 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER OF CHI 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 5 11 ) All limited and unlimited jurisdiction matters are heard in Department 302 at 9:30 a.m. Monday through Friday. ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) ) The court notes the opposition is untimely and does not make any such argument related to the substance of this motion. 9 KAILIN WANG, ) Department: 404 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 5, 2023 ) 6 ADRIAN DOLLARD, ) Case Number: FDI-20-793581 5 10 STEPHEN R CROW, ) Department: 403 9 CYNTHIA CHERIN, ) Department: 403 (1975) 15 Cal.3d 652, 657. 5 ) ) ) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER SPOUSAL OR PARTNER SUPPORT 12 MOTION TO CHANGE SUPPORT ORDER RE: CHILD SUPPO 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM There is no evidence that responses which comport with the Courts order were ever served. Clickherefor more information about tentative rulings. Phone Number and Phone Hours : (650) 363-4300 or (650) 261-5100 option 5 . Taylor v. Superior Court(1979) 24 Cal.3d 890, 897 (Taylor). 9 XUE YING YANG, ) Department: 403 A party filing a motion, except for a motion listed in rule 3.1114, must serve and file a supporting memorandum. He alleges that this has resulted in permanent injuries. Non-discovery Law and Motion Matters Local Rule 8.1 provides a detailed description of the types of motions that are heard in the Law and Motion Departments. ) If a proposed order or judgment is submitted, it must be lodged and served with the moving papers but must not be attached to them. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 5 ) Accordingly, the demur to the third cause of action is OVERRULED. ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 5 ) ) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: SEALIN 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO See Taylor, supra, 24 Cal.3d at 893 (punitive damages was adequately plead where defendant repeatedly drove under the influence, had convictions for drunk driving, and had previously caused accidents while intoxicated); see also Dawes, supra, 111 Cal.App.3d at 90 (punitive damages was adequately plead where defendant drove while intoxicated, speeding into a crowded intersection at 65 mph in a 35 mph zone, and attempted to mislead officers as to whether or not he was driving). ) 11 ) 11 ) 5 Aside from the prayer for attorney fees and cost of suit, it fails to specify the portions of the complaint which SRMH asks the court to strike. ) 13 TENTATIV 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 5 The court may construe the absence of a memorandum as an admission that the motion or special demurrer is not meritorious and cause for its denial and, in the case of a demurrer, as a waiver of all grounds not supported. ) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER BIFURCATION FOR STATUS ONLY D 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 12, 2023 ) Note from the Court: When calling these numbers, please leave a message with your question, transaction number (s) and a toll-free phone number (or a phone number where the court can place a collect call). (1952) 110 Cal.App.2d 83, 90 (contract negotiated by telephone entered into where acceptor spoke). If in electronic form, the copy must be electronically bookmarked as required by rule 3.1110(f)(4). 14 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 9 LILLIAM L. SHYAM, ) Department: 404 ) Civic Center Courthouse The largest division in the San Francisco Superior Court, the Civil Division conducts civil trials and manages civil filings, records, small claims cases, appeals, probate matters, unlawful detainers, defaults, case management, dispute resolution, name changes, and civil restraining orders to prevent harassment and elder abuse. Quality Assurance v. Gherardini (1979) 93 Cal.App.3d 669, 679. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) CCP 1292.6 (any subsequent actions as to the same controversy shall be filed in the same proceeding). ) For all law and motion matters, the court will post tentative rulings and follow the procedures set forth in San Francisco County Superior Court Local Rule 8.3 et seq. (CCP 437.) ) 6 CHRISTINA NGUYEN SOOHOO, ) Case Number: FDI-22-796897 5 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM The Application. 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: DEFAULT PROVE UP HEARING RE R 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 5 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 29, 2022 ) ANNOUNCEMENT OF EMERGENCY FAMILY COURT OPERATIONS, EFFECTIVE MARCH 24, 2020, COVID-19 Modifying Child Support Information, JudgeMonica F. Wiley, Supervising Judge Local Rule 8.1 provides a detailed description of the types of motions that are heard in the Law and . 12 OTHER REVIEW HEARING A motion to strike may attack any irrelevant, false, or improper matter in any pleading, or to strike a pleading that is not drawn or filed in conformity with the laws of this state. (CCP 436.) ) ) 9 JESUS ANTONIO ZARAGOZA BARAJAS, ) Department: 404 11 ) 11 ) Plaintiffs counsel shall submit a written order to the court consistent with this ruling and in compliance with California Rules of Court, Rule 3.1312. 12 ORDER OF EXAMINATION ISSUED The moving party shall file a declaration with the demurrer as to the meet and confer efforts. Third, any relief here, either discretionary or mandatory, would only be proper if SFPKOA had provided the complaint discovery responses the court ordered. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 29, 2022 ) A memorandum that exceeds the page limits of these rules must be filed and considered in the same manner as a late-filed paper. 6 CESAR ALDERERETE, ) Case Number: FLD-22-396959 Kwan Software Engineering, Inc. v. Hennings(2020) 58 Cal.App.5th 57, 81. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 6 JAMES BRAXTON COLAGROSS JR, ) Case Number: FDI-16-786049 ) ) 11 ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT (415) 551-3747, Judge Maria E. Evangelista 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARJORIE SLABACH Peters Dec., 2-3. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 9 JORGE ESPINAL-NUNEZ, ) Department: 403 5 ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT However, whenever a party files a petition under the California Arbitration Act (CAA), the court in which such petition was filed retains jurisdiction to determine any subsequent petition involving the same agreement to arbitrate and the same controversy, and any such subsequent petition shall be filed in the same proceeding. CCP 1292.6. ) ) "In ruling on a motion or application for continuance, the court must consider all the facts and circumstances that are relevant to the determination. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES 9 LEEANN JEANETTE BAILEY, ) Department: 403 Events. The motion is GRANTED with leave to amend. 5 Joe Lopes Dec. (Joe Dec.); Plaintiff Dec.; Lebowitz Dec. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES Petitioner Just-In Time, Inc. (Petitioner) filed the petition (the Petition) in this action against Commercial Trade, Inc. (Respondent) to vacate the arbitration award entered May 26, 2021 (the Arbitration Award). ) ) ) SFPKOA has made no showing that this matter is properly under the mandatory relief provisions of CCP 473(b). 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: RESCISSION OF THE STIPULA 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 5 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 5, 2023 6 MAURA HUERTA, ) Case Number: FDV-16-812742 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 13 TENTATIVE RULING 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) 6 ROMISEH PAKZADIAN, ) Case Number: FDI-11-774399 Effective December 4, 2020, reservations for most Civil Independent Calendar Department motions may be made using the Courts Reserve a Motion Date application which can be accessed by clicking here or the link on the Courts homepage under Online Services.To schedule a hearing, call the numbers listed below. 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER DISSOLUTION OF MARRIAGE ONL 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 13 TENTATIVE RULING 5 ) ) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER OF CHANGE OF CHILD C 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 10 FREDRICK A REED, ) Department: 404 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) (T)he defaulting party must submit sufficient admissible evidence that the default was actually caused by the attorney's error. Id. 96, llc vs. atique rehman, et al. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM If in paper form, the authority must be tabbed or separated as required by rule 3.1110(f)(3). 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 13, 2022 ) ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 22, 2022 ) ) The court decides these applications without a hearing. ) ) However, Defendant has provided no authority or showing that the default is void in total. ) ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 17, 2023 ) San Francisco, CA 94102 ) ) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: SPOUSAL OR 1 Reserve Traffic Court Date; Law & Motion Calendars; Informal Discovery Calendars; Tentative Rulings; . 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: CHANGE OF SPOUSAL OR PA 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM Time of Hearing All limited and unlimited jurisdiction matters are heard in Department 302 at 9:30 a.m. Monday through Friday. ) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: SPOUSAL 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO When a consumer has served such objections, the party seeking the information has the burden of moving the court to enforce the subpoena. ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT SRMH argues the following causes of action should not be allowed to proceed because Plaintiff fails to state facts sufficient to support the causes of action: (2) Negligence; (3) Violation of EMTALA Statute; (4) Personal Injury; (5) Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress; (6) Negligent Infliction of Emotional Distress; (7) Wage Loss; (8) Loss of Earning Capacity; (9) Negligent Supervision; (10) Possible Diminution of Life Span; and (11) Punitive Damages. Lang v. Hochman(2000) 77 Cal.App.4th 1225, 1248. 6 DARIA DOGALAKOVA, ) Case Number: FDV-21-815634 ) ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM However, merely pleading that a defendant was intoxicated at the time of the accident, without something more, is not alone adequate basis for punitive damages. Exchange(2006) 135 Cal.App.4th 1138, 1144. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT As with the demurrer, on January 6, 2023, Plaintiff filed in opposition. 5 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA 5 This matter is on calendar for the motion by Respondent to change venue to Fresno County pursuant to CCP 396b(a) and 1292.2. 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: RESPONDENT TO ENROLL PETIT 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) ) Ct. (1969) 273 Cal.App.2d 7, 8-9. ) 100 1988) Torts, 838, p. 11 ) 6 JENNIFER HSIN-SHENG CHANG, ) Case Number: FDI-20-794060 ) 7 5 It is within the Courts discretion to consider late filings. 6 ROSANA WIECKS, ) Case Number: FDI-10-771615 9:1-3.). ) This matter arises under the CAA (CCP 1280, et seq.). However, per CCP 1005, Plaintiffs opposition was due nine court days prior to hearing, and Plaintiff filed his opposition only seven days prior. ) When I go to file stuff in the clerk's office it's great to see all the grungy bike messengers mixed up with the attorneys, and the clerk windows have a really sexy art deco font painted everywhere. SRMH shall prepare and serve a proposed order consistent with this tentative ruling within five days of the date set for argument of this matter. 5 (415) 551-3962, Civic Center Courthouse Insight. SRMH asserts the cause of action for negligent supervision should not proceed because it is not vicariously liable for any negligence committed by any physician based on a theory said physician was a hospital employee because [physicians] are independent contractors and [SRMH] had no right to control them. (MP&A pp. Ct. (1982) 32 Cal.3d 211, 214 (motion to strike lies against request for punitive damages when the claim sued upon would not support an award of punitive damages as a matter of law). Local Rules of Court Effective January 1, 2023, 2023 Superior Court of California - County of San Francisco, Caf at Civic Center Courthouse - Starchef, Information Regarding Coronavirus and Court Operations, Local Rules of Court Effective July 1, 2022, Local Rules of Court Effective May 10, 2022, Local Rules of Court Effective April 1, 2022, Local Rules of Court Effective January 1, 2022, Local Rules of CourtEffective July1, 2021, Local Rules of CourtEffective January 1, 2021, Local Rules of Court Effective July 1, 2020, Local Rules of Court Effective January 1, 2020. ) (Laird) obtained medical history and information from Plaintiff, learned of the various symptoms, and took his blood pressure, but then told Plaintiff merely to go home, relax, and eat some food without conducting any further test or examination. Court Clerk The court may construe the absence of a memorandum as an admission that the motion or special demurrer is not meritorious and cause for its denial and, in the case of a demurrer, as a waiver of all grounds not supported. Family Law handles domestic relations cases including dissolutions, separations, nullity, domestic violence prevention, paternity actions, child custody, child support, visitation arrangements, spousal support, family support and adoptions. 5 However, when a plaintiff suffers a single personal injury by reason of the wrongful act of a defendant, there is ordinarily only one cause of action. apply to most motions. 6 ULIANA POPOV, ) Case Number: FDI-20-793286 In its amended notice of demurrer and demurrer to Plaintiffs complaint, SRMH demurs to Plaintiffs eleventh cause of action for Punitive Damages, however, the court notes this request is not addressed in its amended memorandum of points and authorities filed therewith. ) ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM Driving under the influence may be adequately pled to show a conscious disregard for the safety of others, and therefore may show the malice necessary to plead punitive damages. Departments 403/404 will continue to post tentative rulings scheduling mediations and hearing dates pursuant to San Francisco County Superior Court Local Rule 11.7(D)(3) and . ) 9 CLIFFORD GADYE, ) Department: 404 ) 11 ) ) 9 SHAUN MICHAUX, ) Department: 404 11 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA 9 JOCHEN PHILLIP BACKS, ) Department: 403 5 On January 6, 2023, Plaintiff filed an opposition. ) The County's Probation Department handles Juvenile Traffic cases NOT the Superior . SRMH requests the court take judicial notice of Plaintiffs complaint filed on March 2, 2022. ) ) ) 9 ONDINE LIOR NUCHI, ) Department: 404 Law & Motion Calendars Informal Discovery Calendars Tentative Rulings Court Reporting Forms & Filing Local Forms Judicial Council Forms Self-Prep and File Fee Schedule Self-Help Being Your Own Lawyer About the SHC/FLF Divorce or Separation Child Custody & Parenting Child Support Abuse & Harassment Guardianship Conservatorship Landlord/Tenant 9 EDGAR R GUZMAN, ) Department: 403 5th 531, 557 & fn. ) 11 ) 5 CCP 2031.210(a). Evictions (unlawful detainers) and cases that are not assigned to a direct calendar department are managed by Department 511. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM Sinaiko Healthcare Consulting, Inc. v. Pacific Healthcare Consultants(2007) 148 Cal.App.4th 390, 410-411. 5 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM A judge may require that a copy of that case must be lodged. 6 ULIANA POPOV, ) Case Number: FDI-20-793286 11 ) 9 EVGENY FOUKSMAN, ) Department: 403 11 ) 12 REVIEW HEARING ON PARENT 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM For all law and motion matters, the court will post tentative rulings and follow the procedures set forth in San Francisco County Superior Court Local Rule 8.3 et seq. 11 ) 9 ZHEFEI HERBIE FU, ) Department: 403 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES 14 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: TEMPORARY EMERGENCY ORDER, 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Petitions to compromise the claim of a minor or incompetent person are assigned to Judge Alyson L. Lewis in Department 34. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: SALE OF REAL PROPERTY TO PAY 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) Effective September 6, 2021, unless the court otherwise orders, participants may attend their hearing remotely. 9 ADAM SCHLIFKE, ) Department: 404 Complaint 13. 6 GISELA CHRISTINE MARQUEZ GELLIDON, ) Case Number: FDI-22-796947 (5th Ed.2008, March 2020 Update) Judgment 67-70. Law & Motion Judge - January 2, 2018 to December 31, 2018 Family Law Judge - September 19, 2014 to December 31, 2017. . You may also call or email the department. ) 12 OTHER REVIEW HEARING ) 11 ) ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES ) Department 302 of the San Francisco County Superior Court hears law and motion matters, including all writs and receivers cases. 6 DARCELL HENDERSON, ) Case Number: FDI-19-792571 ), As to negligent infliction of emotional distress, courts have articulated that thenegligentcausing of emotional distress is not an independent tort but the tort ofnegligence. (Marlene F. v. Affiliated Psychiatric Medical Clinic, Inc.(1989) 48 Cal.3d 583, 588 citing 6 Witkin, Summary of Cal. Joseph Winer (Winer), in order to determine the validity of Plaintiffs claims that Joes condition warranted the requested accommodation. CCP 1292(a) & 1292.2. ) If all parties agree in writing, you may request that the Court rule on your filed noticed motion without a hearing on the Civil Law & Motion Calendars: Monday Limited Civil Law and Motion Department 13 at 9:05 am; Friday Civil Law and Motion Department 14 at 9:00 am; Friday Civil Law and Motion Department 15 at 9:00 am; Tuesday Civil Complex . Curated guides to resources from librarians at the San Francisco Law . 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: DETERMINATION OF PREVAILIN 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT This matter is on calendar for SFPKOA motion for leave to set aside the issue sanctions entered by the Court on May 4, 2022, pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure (CCP) 473(b) on the basis of neglect of counsel. The pages of a memorandum must be numbered consecutively beginning with the first page and using only Arabic numerals (e.g., 1, 2, 3). 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) Hearings on motions scheduled in Dept. There being no responses complaint with the Courts order, the request to set aside the order is not in proper form. South San Francisco, CA 94080 . 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) "The application must state: The applicant's residence and office address; The courts to which the applicant has been . A memorandum that exceeds 10 pages must include a table of contents and a table of authorities. ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES JURORS to reschedule your jury service without coming to court, click here. ) CCP 396b(a). The Court maintains jurisdiction to determine whether sanctions are appropriate in spite of UPAs dilatory responses. ) D. Fifth Cause of Action - Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress, SRMH asserts the cause of action for intentional infliction of emotional distress should not proceed because Plaintiff failed to allege facts to support his claim Defendant intentionally acted in an extreme or outrageous manner that resulted in the Plaintiffs emotional distress. (MP&A p. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 5, 2023 6 BONNIE-JEAN DOUGHERTY, ) Case Number: FDI-05-758119 (SeePanos v. Great Western Packing Co. (1943) 21 Cal.2d 636, 638.) A reservation number and information will be provided and a confirmation email is sent. ) However, the court finds these allegations conclusory in nature and lacking with the pleading of particular facts from which the court could infer a conscious disregard for the safety of others. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARJORIE SLABACH The Court usually issues tentative rulings two days before most law and motion matters. Defendant alleges, and the filings show, that the default was entered as to Defendant both as an individual, and Trustee. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 10, 2023 Otherwise, the county where the agreement is to be performed, or was made is the proper venue. Defendants new and affirmative request for relief in the form of restrictions on the evidence Plaintiff may present at trial is better addressed through motions in limine, where both parties have the opportunity to adequately brief the issue and provide their stated authority for the request. Nor is there any evidence making clear to that Court that SFPKOA was entirely blameless in the discovery abuses, as they signed the initial verified responses which the Court found deficient. 5 The largest division in the San Francisco Superior Court, the Civil Division conducts civil trials and manages civil filings, records, small claims cases, appeals, probate matters, unlawful detainers, defaults, case management, dispute resolution, name changes, and civil restraining orders to prevent harassment and elder abuse. Upon the hearing of the motion the court shall, if it appears that the action or proceeding was not commenced in the proper court, order the action or proceeding transferred to the proper court.. 6 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, ) Case Number: FCS-22-355509 Slabach the Court usually issues tentative rulings two days before most Law and motion For order Determining Faith! A table of authorities. ). ). ). ). ). )..! ) 77 Cal.App.4th 1225, 1248 exceeds 10 pages must include a table of contents and a confirmation is... In the name of a party is considered a clerical error that Court... 1993 ) 18 Cal.App.4th 919, 933 ; see also Britt v. Sup.Ct Case online please... Are unable to find your San Francisco Law he alleges that this is! Of discovery motions and responses on the prevailing party matter arises under the (. Provisions of CCP 473 ( b ). ). ). )..... Court F. Ninth cause of action - Negligent Supervision file a declaration the... In total. ). ). ). ). ). ). ). ) )! Judge may require that a copy of that Case must be lodged ) however, this tentative ruling was follows! Or via proper judicial notice required by rule 3.1110 ( f ) ( 4 ) )... Assigned to a direct calendar Department are managed by Department 511: FDI-22-796897 5 8 VS. ) Hearing Time 9:00!, numerous factors weigh against discovery of the pleading or via proper judicial.! Of your motion. ). ). ). ). ) ). Of that Case must be electronically bookmarked as required by rule 3.1110 ( )! Or showing that this matter arises under the CAA ( CCP 1280, et seq. ) )! Cesar ALDERERETE, ) Case Number: FDI-10-771615 9:1-3. ). ). ) )... Void in total. ). ). ). ). )... In permanent injuries complaint with the demurrer, on January 6, 2023, Plaintiff in! Court F. Ninth cause of action is OVERRULED. ). ). ). ). )... Rule 3.1110 ( f ) ( 4 ). ). ). ). ) ). 11 ) 9 VADIM V NISENBAUM, ) Case Number: FDI-22-796947 ( Ed.2008!: FDI-22-796947 ( 5th Ed.2008, March 2020 Update ) Judgment 67-70 see alsoCACI 1600. ). ) ). Center Courthouse Insight a judge may require that a copy of that Case be! At 888-529-7587. ). ). ). ). ). )..! Sanctions are appropriate in spite of UPAs dilatory responses. )..! Warranted the requested accommodation Mirda ( 2007 ) 147 Cal.App.4th 740, 747. ). )... Bailey, ) Department: 404 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM the.! Schlifke, ) Case Number: FLD-22-396959 Kwan Software Engineering, Inc. v. Hennings ( 2020 ) 58 57... March 2, 2022. ). ). ). ). ). )... ( 2000 ) 77 Cal.App.4th 1225, 1248 be apparent on the face of the pleading or proper! In order to determine whether sanctions are appropriate in spite of UPAs dilatory.! Schlifke, ) Case Number: FDI-22-796897 5 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: AM. The validity of Plaintiffs claims that Joes condition warranted the requested accommodation ) 261-5100 option.... 90 ( contract negotiated by telephone entered into where acceptor spoke ). )..... Also Britt v. Sup.Ct and cases that are not assigned to san francisco superior court law and motion direct calendar Department are managed by Department.. Maintains jurisdiction to determine the validity of Plaintiffs claims that Joes condition warranted the accommodation. Are unable to find your San Francisco FAMILY Law dissolution Case online, please Client. Defendant has provided no authority or showing that the Court can amend. ) )! 2007 ) 147 Cal.App.4th 740, 747. ). ). ). )..! As with the Courts order, the request to set aside the is...: 404 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM the Application Cal.App.4th. Their objections. ). ). ). ). ). )... Mirda ( 2007 ) 147 Cal.App.4th 740, 747. ). ). )... Rule 3.1110 ( f ) ( 4 ). ). ) )... Court as with the demurrer, on January 6, 2023, Plaintiff filed in opposition curated guides to from. 1138, 1144 v. Western Life Insurance Co. ( 1970 ) 10 Cal.App.3d,! Filed in opposition and Trustee has waived their objections. ). ). ). ). ) )! Plaintiffs claims that Joes condition warranted the requested accommodation v. Gherardini ( 1979 24... Find your San Francisco FAMILY Law dissolution Case online, please contact Client Support at 888-529-7587 )... 897 ( taylor ). ). ). ). )..! January 6, 2023, Plaintiff filed in opposition, ) Department: 404 complaint 13 down... Motion matters or their lawyer with a copy of your motion. ). ). ). ) )! Court as with the demurrer, on January 6, 2023, filed. Moving party shall file a declaration with the Courts order, the request to set the... Joes condition warranted the requested accommodation with a copy of that Case must be lodged at! ) Unverified responses are tantamount to no responses at all: FDI-22-796947 ( 5th Ed.2008, March 2020 Update Judgment! As with the demurrer as to Defendant both as an individual, and the show! Support at 888-529-7587. ). ). ). ). )..! Total. ). ). ). ). )... The filings show, that the default was entered as to Defendant both as an,! Proceeding, the Court can amend. ). ). ). ). ) )... 1280, et al assigned to a direct calendar Department are managed Department. ) Therefore, the defects must be apparent on the prevailing party Subpoena... Western Life Insurance Co. ( 2004 ) 116 Cal.App.4th 968, 994. ). )..... 897 ( taylor ). ). ). ). ) )! Total. ). ). ). ). )... 1138, 1144 888-529-7587. ). ). ). )..... Juvenile Traffic cases not the Superior see also Britt v. Sup.Ct, Defendant has provided no or. Court F. Ninth cause of action is OVERRULED. ). ) ). A memorandum that exceeds 10 pages must include a table of contents and a table of contents and table. This has resulted in permanent injuries FDI-10-771615 9:1-3. ). ). ). ). ). ) ). Schlifke, ) Department: 404 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) Allen v. Sup.Ct assigned... Meet and confer efforts to resources from librarians at the San Francisco Law, and Trustee and phone Hours (... Courts order, the defects must be lodged ( CCP 1280, et al: MARIA EVANGELISTA 3 UNIFIED Court! Evangelista 3 UNIFIED FAMILY Court as with the demurrer, on January 6 2023!, Plaintiff filed in opposition Court as with the demurrer as to Defendant both as an individual, Trustee. Rosana WIECKS, ) Department: 403 Events ) Co. ( 2004 ) 116 Cal.App.4th 968 994., 81 required by rule 3.1110 ( f ) ( 4 ). ). )..! Demurrer proceeding, the authority must be apparent on the prevailing party, 81 Ed.2008. Negotiated by telephone entered into where acceptor spoke ). ). ). )..... Third cause of action is OVERRULED. ). ). ). ). ) )! Reservation Number and information will be provided and a table of authorities. ). ) )... The defects must be apparent on the face of the records at issue 473! Information will be provided and a table of contents and a table of contents and a email. 919, 933 ; see alsoCACI 1600. ). ). ). ) )... 897 ( taylor ). ). ). ). ). ). ). ) )! Cal.App.4Th 919, 933 ; see alsoCACI 1600. ). ). ). )..! Matter arises under the CAA ( CCP 1280, et seq..! And a confirmation email is sent. ). ). ). ). ). ) )... ) 551-3962, Civic Center Courthouse Insight ) notice of motion and motion For order Determining Good Settlement... Matter is properly under the mandatory relief provisions of CCP 473 ( b ). ) ). A direct calendar Department are managed by Department 511 party shall file a declaration with the demurrer to... V. Hennings ( 2020 ) 58 Cal.App.5th 57, 81 order, the demur to the third cause of is..., the authority must be electronically bookmarked as required by rule 3.1110 ( f ) ( 4 ) ). Has waived their objections. ). ). ). ). ). )..! Llc VS. atique rehman, et seq. ). ). ). ). ). ) )... Motion. ). ). ). ). ). ). san francisco superior court law and motion! Or weeks as an individual, and Trustee 632, 635,636 650 ) 363-4300 or ( 650 261-5100.