santa clara county superior court tentative rulings

Currently before the Court are the demurrer and motion to strike by defendant Regional Medical Center of San Jose (RMCSJ). 16 corporation; PINNER USA, INC., a New Jersey For information about getting help through the Self Help Center/Family Law Facilitators Office click here. CASE NO. A: click . Background Tentative Rulings. (See FAC, IT-1, subpara. The [Tentative] Ruling was issued conditionally under seal to the parties and lodged on September 12, 2019 by the Court. SERENOVA LLC V. ALLIED DISPATCH SOLUTIONS, INC., ET AL. 53 and 916-874-7848 for Department 54. Department D. Vacant-Assigned Judge. The tentative rulings will be available after 2:00 p.m. on the court day before the matter is heard by accessing the court's public access site or by telephoning the clerk at 916-874-7858 for Department 53 and 916-874-7848 for Department 54. Where appearance has been requested or invited by Plaintiff filed a complaint against Defend 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Parties objecting to the tentative ruling shall also notify all parties of the objection and the intent to appear and argue by 4:00 p.m. on the day prior to the hearing. 16 CENTER; NEW WORLD HEALTH STAFFING V. KATHY KEJIE ZHANG, PAMELA SHERE CHAMBERS V. MERCHANTS & MEDICAL CREDIT CORPORATION, INC., ET. LAGOS V. THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY, ET AL. The Department is located in the Downtown Superior Courthouse (DTS) at 191 North First Street in San Jose. MICHAEL SCHMITZ ET AL VS HEALTHIQ RE, INC. ALPHA OMEGA HOUSE CORPORATION VS THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY, LABOR COMMISSIONER FOR THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA V. CANTON PROSPECT INC., ET. If you do not have access to the Internet during the time period when the rulings are posted and you wish to obtain your tentative ruling, please call (408) 882-2515 for assistance. VINCENT MCPHILLIP VS NICOLAS KOKKALIS ET AL. JUSTIN SCHOELKOPH V. NORTH AMERICAN ON-SITE, LLC, ET AL. Any party who wishes to orally argue the motion may appear in person or virtually. Sacramento Superior Court In state-court civil litigation cases filed in Santa Clara County Superior of California, courts may issue tentative rulings prior to motion hearings. This is a lemon law action brought by Plaintiffs Brian Crook and Donna Bloom (Plaintiffs) against Defendants Ford Motor Company and Santa Margarita Ford (Defendants). The claims relate t . (See Fourth First 15 AKBAR MATANI, ET AL. 24 This is a putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations. SHUFF V. STEVENS CREEK QUARRY, INC., ET AL. KHAN V. ARENA HOTEL INVESTMENTS, INC., ET AL. RETAIL, INC., ET AL. BENEDICT LOBO V. INTEL MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS NORTH AMERICA INC., ET AL. Commissioner Katherine Hansen. Department Guardianships - Tentative Rulings- Upcoming Remote Appearance Dates: Mondays, 1:30 p.m. calendar1:30 PM - Phone #: 1-(877) 873-8017 - Access Code Department Probate - Tentative Rulings Department Other - Tentative Rulings 2009 Superior Court of Shasta County Contact| Site Map| Jobs| ADA| Disclaimer DERIVATIVE LITIGATION (Consolidated with 13 328572) 14 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF 15 DERIVATIVE SETTLEMENT 16 YCS Investments, Inc. (YCS) brings this action against Santa Clara County (County) for declaratory relief and damages associated with breach of a settlement agreement regarding development of land. The motion was properly served and notice was sufficient and proper. I. TUNG TAI GROUP, INC. V. AMERICAN METAL RECYCLING SERVICES, INC., ET AL. Any party who wishes to be heard in response or opposition to the Court's tentative ruling MUST NOTIFY the Court's Judicial Assistant by telephone at (707) 521-6893 and MUST NOTIFY all other parties of the intent to . PORTFOLIO RECOVERY ASSOCIATES, LLC, 24 23 I. 6 ET AL. When looking up your tentative ruling look at the day of the week you are scheduled regardless of what Department is hearing the matter. Defendant Foster Poultry Farms Motion for Summary Judgment or, in the Alternative, Summary Adjudication CMP calendar that is not an Arbitration Status Conference. Background 50, inclusive, In this section. RESPONSES LUSAMERICA FOODS. SANTA CLARA COUNTY FEDERAL CREDIT UNION V. SHAHEEN, FOURFRONT SALES, INC. VS FINISAR CORPORATION, UBIQUITI NETWORKS, INC. V. NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE CO. OF PITTSBURGH, PA. KEVIN CHRISTIAN ET AL. Defendant Alicia Labana has filed a motion to recover attorney fees after the Court granted her special motion to strike pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 425.16. OF THE PARTY CONTESTING THE TENTATIVE RULING OR; 2. Superior Court of CA County of San Joaquin Select Your Language English Spanish Chinese Russian Filipino Punjabi Khmer Vietnamese Arabic Persian Hmong SMALLER. Tentative rulings in Santa Clara County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil cases. GUYSI V. BOMBARDIER TRANSPORTATION SERVICES USA CORPORATION, ET AL. A. Factual and Procedural Background Footnote 18: 19 First 5 Being Your Own Lawyer; 23 I. All noticed motions and demurrers shall include Both notifications must be completed no later than 4:00 p.m. on the court day immediately preceding the day of the hearing. The tentative ruling will become the order of the Court, and no hearing will be held, unless a party contests the tentative ruling. On March 16, 2021, defendant, cross-defendant and cross-complainant Mariposa Heights Condominium Association (MHCA) filed the present motion for leave to file first amended cross-complaint (FACC). Plaintiffs motion for entry of default is DENIED, for many reasons. FORREST HUFF V. SECURITAS SECURITY SERVICES USA, INC., ET AL. To refresh your browser press F5 on the keyboard. District 1 Mike WassermanDistrict 2 Cindy ChavezDistrict 3 Dave CorteseDistrict 4 Susan EllenbergDistrict 5 Joe Simitian, 70 West Hedding Street 11th Floor San Jose, CA 95110. alendar Line 3 On this page a few topics are listed for each Self-Help area, but click the MORE link after each section below for a more complete list. Family Law Tentative Rulings. vs. HI.Q, INC. The court has read and considered the authorities and argument of counsel set forth in the motion to lift stay of discovery, opposition and reply, and makes the following tentative ruling: 16 York corporation; and DOES 1 through 10, 16 vs. LEE WEBSTER V. PLATINUM PARKING MANAGEMENT, LLC, ET AL. WILVER CASTILLO V. RUSSELL STONE AND SIMPLY GREEN PLUMBING, INC. PALO ALTO PROPERTY OWNER LLC V. THE GROCERY MEN I, LLC, ET AL. Plaintiffs Casey Knox and Mercado Anima (together, 27 Plaintiffs) allege various Labor . 12 WILLIAM SHUFF, an individual; CHRISTOPHER BRYAN, an individual; and 13 NICK HERNANDEZ, an individual, on behalf of TENTATIVE RULING RE: PETITION themselves and all others similarly situated, TO COMPEL ARBITRATION 14 V. ZHEN ZHEN LI, ET AL. 25 According to the allegations of the Fourth Amended Compla 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Defendants Dr. Nicholas Kokkalis (Kokkalis), Dr. Chengdiao Fan (Fan), Pi Community Company (Pi) and SocialChain, Inc. (Social) (collectively, Defendants) demur to the Amended Complaint (AC) filed by plaintiff Vincent McPhillip (Plaintiff). SILVIA HERNANDEZ V. WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, ET AL. V. GREENLAKE ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC/GREENLAKE REAL ESTATE FUND, PENG V. THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF SANTA CLARA COLLEGE. JANE DOE 1, AND JANE DOE 2 V. UNION SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL. Footnote 17: Defendants. 15 vs. [House Hearing, 117 Congress] [From the U.S. Government Publishing Office] EXAMINING OKLAHOMA v. CASTRO-HUERTA: THE IMPLICATIONS OF THE SUPREME COURT'S RULING ON TRIBAL SOVEREIGNTY ===== OVERSIGHT HEARING BEFORE THE SUBCOMMITTEE FOR INDIGENOUS PEOPLES OF THE UNITED STATES OF THE COMMITTEE ON NATURAL RESOURCES U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED SEVENTEENTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION . The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 22 follows: The operative First Amended Complaint (FAC) was filed by plaintiffs Tan Nguyen, Nghia Nguyen, Kim Thuy Ho (Ho) (collectively the Owners), the owners of the condominium un 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA 10 VS. MARIA OSEGUERA, ET AL. ANDRES ALEJANDRO MERCADO V. SECURITY INDUSTRY SPECIALISTS, INC., ET AL. smanoukian@scsCourt.org The motion was timely filed and served. 2001) 261 F.3d 912, . Tentative rulings issued by Department 3 will be accessible on this page after 2:00 p.m. on the court day preceding the scheduled hearing. Co. (1963) 217 Cal.App.2d 678, 698-699 ["items appear . LLC, et al. LCC WAREHOUSE III LLC VS. 5150 ECR GROUP LLC. To arrange an appearance to contest a tentative ruling, notify the Court at (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing. INTRODUCTION 25 According to the allegations of the 8 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Tentative rulings are available online by 4:00 p.m. before the scheduled motion day. COMPANY, INC.; MATTHEW 7 This is a wage and hour class action by employees of defendant Wells Fargo Bank, National Association. According to the separate statement in support of said motion SPECIAL INTERROGATORY NO. LY, ET AL. Background Superior Court, 16 Faulkner v. McAfee, Inc., Santa alendar Line 3 The Court now issue 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Defendants' Request for Judicial Notice is GRANTED. ((See Declaration of (Richard J. Tentative rulings will be accessible on the link below after 3:00 pm on the court day preceding the scheduled hearing. 15 HUGHES, DANNY JORDAN, EVET LOEWEN, Civil Tentative Rulings are provided for: Civil Collection Cases ext. CHRIST THE GOOD SHEPHERD CHURCH V. ELIZABETH ASADI, ET AL. 16 Ohio corporation; and DOES 1 through 10, Proposed orders submitted after the date of the hearing may experience delays in processing and are subject to the requirements under CRC 3.1312. 24 This is a putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations. In August 2017 Plaintiff was informed that the property had been sold to Defendants Fortune Realty LLC a First The Court may issue a tentative ruling before the hearing of a law and motion matter. Factual and Procedural Background Parties who disagree may wish to continue with oral argument at the scheduled legal motion time. by clicking the Inbox on the top right hand corner. Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. Adding your team is easy in the "Manage Company Users" tab. CITY OF SANTA CLARA VS PSB NORTHERN CALIFORNIA INDUSTRIAL, VENCLOSE INC., ET AL. I. (Complaint, BC-1 and Exh. Agency (9th Cir. 7 Robertson solicited athletic women 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Tentative rulings for certain departments are available this website, on the pages linked below. Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. BELL INVESTMENT PARTNERS, LLC V. DD STONEBROOK DRIVE, LLC, ET AL. 3 Tentative Rulings. 12 ALORICA INC., a Delaware corporation, 13 Plaintiff, TENTATIVE RULING RE: DEMURRER TO FORTINET INC.S 14 vs. FIRST AMENDED CROSS- COMPLAINT if ALL parties stipulate to a particular tentative ruling or all of them please notify the JA and that motion may be dropped from calendar. will be able to access it on trellis. SILVACO, INC. V. OLE CHRISTIAN ANDERSEN, ET AL. 17 Corporation; and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, DATE: 3 June 202. 26 This is a putative class action. According to the allegations of the first amended complaint (FAC), plaintiffs Keith Tai Wong (Wong) and his wife, Lina Chen (Chen) (collectively, Plaintiffs) are the owners of a commercial tow truck. public access site after 2:00 p.m. the day before the hearing to V. INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS LOCAL NUMBER 3, CATO V. ALLIED UNIVERSAL SECURITY SERVICES. Check Jury Reporting Status. BAYKHURAZOV V. FRIENDFINDER NETWORKS, ET AL. These are two separate but related actions now involving the same counsel and arising from the same event. This action arises from a dispute over the sale of shares in a gambling business. 23 This action arises from a dispute over the settlement of an earlier lawsuit. Please wait a moment while we load this page. 16 SERVICES USA CORPORATION, a Delaware JIGUETT SANCHEZ-NIGRO VS FOOTHILL HEALTH CENTER, INC. SUPERIOR COURT VS. ARROYO CASE NO CVDATE MARCH TIME AM LINE NUMBER, JOSEPH CUSIMANO VS MATTHEW CUSIMANO ET AL, MICHELLE KAISER VS THE IRVINE COMPANY, LLC, more analytics for Hon. HIDDEN ELEPHANT, INC. VS LIMBIC SOFTWARE, INC. CHING-YAO CHU ET AL VS CREATIVE HABITAT, INC. the hearing and listen to the tentative ruling. HELEN THERESA GIVENS V. ROY ANTHONY GIVENS, ET AL. make a tentative ruling on the merits of this matter by 2:00 p.m., the court day ROBERT WILSON, VOLZ, ET AL. JANE DOE V. UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, ET AL. 22 According to the allegations of the Complaint, f alendar Line 3 Rulings will remain accessible until the next weeks rulings are posted. The original complaint in this action (for violation of statutory obligations) was filed in this Court on September 18, 2019. BACKSTAGE NETWORKS VS. SMARTWAVE TECHNOLOGIES LLCS DEMURRER TO PLAINTIFFS SMARTWAVE TECHNOLOGIES LLC. 22 I. Civil Law and Motion ext. TEMPORARY Virtual Hearing Links During Microsoft Teams Outage https://www.sdcourt.ca.gov/virtualhearings. V. REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER OF SAN JOSE, ET AL. Court's ROBERT & LUCY PATTERSON V. KIA MOTORS AMERICA, INC., ET AL. The Court may charge fees to access documents in the future. To arrange an appearance to contest a tentative ruling, notify the Court at (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing. Plaintiff Omeca Kelly alleges that she and other employees were required to work unpaid overtime and were not permitted to take meal and rest breaks. Gloria Estillore (Plaintiff) brings this action against Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc., U.S. Bank N.A., as trustee on behalf of the holders of J.P. Morgan Alternative Loan Trust 2007-A2 mortgage pass through certificates, and Peter Carey (Defendants) for damages associated with wrongful foreclosure. 7 ROE 1, ET AL. DOE V. SANTA CLARA COUNTY OFFICE OF EDUCATION, ET AL. If you need assistance with your case, you may go to the court's Self-Help Center located at the Santucci Justice Center, 10820 Justice Center Drive, Roseville. GRIEGO V. THE TEHAMA LAW GROUP, P.C., ET AL. FLORENCE TING V. ALAN WONG, MARIPOSA HEIGHTS CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, ET AL. Last. Unless notification to the probate clerk has been given as provided above, the tentative rulings shall become the rulings of the court at 3:15 p.m. on the day of the hearing. 14 Code compliant responses, without objections to be served within 20 days of the date of this order. 1 To arrange an appearance to contest a tentative ruling, notify the Court at (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing. Before the Court is plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed. For West Slope Civil hearings call: 530-621-6551 for West Slope Family Law hearings call: 530-621-6725 for South Lake Tahoe hearings call: 530-573-3042. Check your tentative ruling for the most up-to-date instructions for court appearances, including the procedure to request oral argument. This is a putative class action on behalf of employees of SIMCO Electronics. Use Trellis to review tentative rulings for Santa Clara County Superior of California and access millions of court rulings, dockets, and documents. Tentative rulings are available on the Internet and by telephone. Plaintiff Helen Givens (Plaintiff) brings this action against her former husband, Roy Givens (Husband) and several other defendants for damages associated with domestic violence and financial abuse. On June 16, 2016, plaintiff Paul Ervin (Plaintiff) was traveling on Interstate 880 near The Alameda exit in San Jose, when a vehicle owned and operated by defendants Porchezhiyan Madhavan (husband) and Indumathy Dakshinamurthy (wife) (collectively, Defendants) rear-ended Plaintiffs vehicl Demurrer of Defendant JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A. 12 DAVID GUYSI, on behalf of himself, all others similarly situated, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiff, FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS 14 ACTION SETTLEMENT vs. SINCO TECHNOLOGIES PTE LTD V. SOON, ET AL. Defendants Jaim Nulman (Nulman) and Yali Pharmaceutical, Ltd. (Yali) (collectively, Defendants) demur to the complaint (Complaint) filed by plaintiff Avelyn Welczer (Plaintiff). V. GOOGLE LLC (CONSOLIDATED ACTION/LEAD CASE), PLAINTIFF JASON FLICKINGER BRINGS THIS MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT INHIS MOVING PAPERS VS. PROC, YCS INVESTMENTS, INC. VS THE COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA. Tentative rulings in Santa Clara County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil cases. Skip to main content. The notice of motion is defective as the date of service is not filled in. Tentative rulings may be accessed on the Last. INTRODUCTION The underlying action in this case arises from a loan whereby Plaintiff Westlake Flooring Company LLC dba Westlake Flooring Services (Plaintiff) agreed to finance the vehicle inventory of Defendant Friendly Wholesalers of California dba See Mo Cars (Friendly Wholesalers) under a Loan and Security Agreement. JENNIFER RICHERT V. SAMARITAN, LLC, ET AL. Adding your team is easy in the "Manage Company Users" tab. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 21 follows: an appearance is required. the court, limited argument will be entertained. The 25 Third Amended Complaint, whic al. SHUFF, ET AL. V. VPM MANAGEMENT, INC., ET AL. dedicated phone number for the department as referenced in the local telephone Currently before the Court are the demurrer and motion to strike by defendant Kathy Kejie Zhang (Defendant). ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.; and 22 According to the Second Amended Complaint (SAC), filed on March 11, 2021, this 23 case arises out of defend 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA ruling, and you have not previously been informed that you are excused from the calendar, You will lose the information in your envelope, https://www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html. Case Records Search. 17 RANDAL TURNER, STEVEN TURNER AND NICHOLAS VINCENT SERIO V. LVNV FUNDING, LLC, ET AL. TONGTAI MACHINE AND TOOL CO., LTD. V. NANO SYSTEM, INC., ET AL. LEADFACTORS, LLC V. CISCO SYSTEMS, INC., ET AL. LEE WEBSTER V. PLATINUM PARKING MANAGEMENT, LLC, ET AL. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle on February 28, 2020, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. PRESERVATION OF BENEFIT PLAN RETIREES ASSOCIATION, ET AL. vs. and DOES 1 through 20, inclusive, PABLO BERUMEN, ET AL. Contact Us. MERLINDA KALALANG VS KAISER FOUNDATION HOSPITALS ET AL. 17 GREGORY L. SIMENDINGER, individually and The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 22 follows: AOHC is the defendant in the UD action and the plaintiff in al. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 22 follows: Tentative rulings are available on this website, on the pages linked below. 882.2240 To contest the ruling, call (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 P.M. LAW & MOTION TENTATIVE RULINGS (First Amended Complaint (FAC), 17.) FORESITE CAPITAL MANAGEMENT IV, LP V. ESFANDYARPOUR, ET AL. 1 SHANNON SANCHEZ V. ABACUS BUSINESS CORPORATION GROUP, INC., ET AL. Santa Monica (1972) 6 Cal.3d 920 . 3 23 I. You will need the free Adobe Acrobat Reader to view and print certain rulings. public access site. V. MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC., ET AL. Decedent was a resident of, amon Plaintiffs Motion for Reconsideration of Summary Adjudication Civil Index. Footnote 15: RAMIREZ, ET AL. INESS SOLUTIONS, INC. V. CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. SUMI LIM VS GERALD BITTNER, JR., DDS ET AL. THE RANCH GOLF CLUB, PURE STORAGE, INC. V. MENLO LAND & CAPITAL II, LLC, MARIE ARNOLD V. SANTA CLARA COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT. 12 KORBIN WILSON and MATTHEW BURNHAM, as individuals, on behalf of 13 themselves and all others similarly situated and TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION the State of California as a private attorney FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF 14 general, CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT 15 Plaintiffs, 4 I. JOHNATHAN E. LOOPER V. SKANSKA USA INC., ET AL. SANDRA LAUDONIU, ET AL. RUBEN MENDOZA V. CITY SPORTS CLUB, ET AL. 16 HEALTHIQ RE, INC., a California corporation; The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 22 follows: Any party who wishes to orally argue the motion may appear in person or virtually. 2 1 This is a products liability, fraud, and medical malpractice case. If you wish to keep the information in your envelope between pages, Civil Tentative Rulings. This is a lemon law action. Before the Court is plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed. V. UNION SCHOOL DIST., ET AL. 12 WILLIAM SHUFF, an individual; and JOHN HOWLAND, an individual, on behalf of 13 themselves and all others similarly situated, TENTATIVE RULING RE: PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR LEAVE 14 Plaintiffs, TO FILE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT; DEFENDANTS 15 vs. MOTION FOR TERMINATING SANCTIONS Tentative Ruling by Phone: (707) 521-6606 - between the hours of 2 pm - 4 pm the day before the hearing. calendar. IN RE QUANTUM CORP. Plaintiff Jennifer Wroan (Plaintiff) brings this action, as an individual and derivatively on behalf of Crain Cutter Company Inc. (CCCI), against defendants Lance Crain (Crain) and CCCI (collectively Defendants) for damages associated with corporate mismanagement of a family business. This action arises out of a business dispute between plaintiff Tongtai Machine and Tool Co., Ltd. (Tongtai) and defendant and cross-complainant Nano Systems, Inc., (Nano). Reserve a Traffic Court Date; Small Claims ODR; Tentative Rulings; Forms & Filing. LEEDEMAN V. SUNRISE CREDIT SERVICES, INC. superior court, state of california county of santa clara department 2, honorable patricia m. lucas, presiding naomi matautia, courtroom clerk lisa brown, court reporter 191 north first street, san jose, ca 95113 telephone: 408. 15 KEYSIGHT TECHNOLOGIES, INC., This is a personal injury action. You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. LACY V. HARMAN INTERNATIONAL INDUSTRIES, INC. (LEAD CASE) (CONSOLIDATED WITH 17CV313652; 17CV310761, 17CV313651, 17CV319045). MERRYFIELDS V. STEVE DIMAGGIO INC., ET AL. However, this tentative ruling information is usually taken down from the court's website after several days or weeks. 25 I. Civil Law and Motion Tentative Rulings are usually available the . Plaintiff bought a 2015 Ford Mustang from Joe Macpherson Ford dba AutoNation Ford Tustin (AutoNation or Dealership) on or about December 16, 2017, when she entered into the written RETAIL INSTALLMENT SALE CONTRACT SIMPLE FINANCE corporation; BOMBARDIER MASS TRANSIT V. ALLIED CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT, INC., ET AL. If you do not call the court and INTRODUCTION 8 (First Amended Complaint (FAC), 5.) INTRODUCTION 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA MARKO VLADISLAVICH V. JAMES L. DAWSON, ET AL. Notice of non-opposition filed. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 21 follows: I. TAYLOR CAPITO V. SAN JOSE HEALTHCARE SYSTEM LP, DBA REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER. 5133 13 16 INC.; LANGAN ENGINEERING AND (PAGA), JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A, VS CHERYL POLAND, KATALYST DEVELOPMENT, LLC VS GABRIEL MICHEL ET AL. Currently before the Court are the demurrer and motion to strike by defendant General Motors LLC (Defendant). appropriate CMP department at 916-874-6353 (Dept. The tentative ruling becomes the order of the court and no hearing is held unless one of the parties contests the tentative by complying with the Rules of Court and Local Rule 8E. 11 17 The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 18 on September 6, 2019, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. V. DARREL MARTINEZ, ET AL. Of Santa Clara County v. City Title Ins. CITIZEN POWER INITIATIVES FOR CHINA V. TENCENT AMERICA LLC, ET AL. I. For best experience, please use latest version of Edge, Chrome, Safari or Firefox browser. I. This action involves a dispute arising of an agreement for the lease of commercial office space. Plaintiff Elizabeth Cardoso (Plaintiff) brings this action against defendant Edward Bright (Defendant) for damages associated with intentional infliction of emotional distress. Filter by a specific county without spaces. TERRESTRIAL DEVELOPMENT LLC ET AL VS JAY BLOUNT ET AL. 13 The Court now issues its tentative ruling 22 as follows: 16 corporation; JEFFREY S. SIMENDINGER, A tentative ruling is a preliminary ruling that states how a court intends to rule on a motion, and courts may modify or reverse civil tentative rulings prior to issuing final rulings, hence the term tentative.. Currently before the Court is the demurrer by defendant Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. (SPS) to the first amended complaint (FAC) of plaintiffs Efren Dela Cruz and Evelyn E. Dela Cruz (collectively, Plaintiffs). the following information in the notice: Pursuant to Local Rule 1.06 (A), the court will V. HARPER, ET AL. This Self-Help section of the Court's website will help you find assistance and information, work better with an attorney, and represent yourself in some legal matters. ; Angela Jasso v. The Ranch Golf Club, et al. Probate Tentative Rulings. If you wish to keep the information in your envelope between pages, V. VIETNAM TOWN CONDOMINIUM OWNERS. Adding your team is easy in the "Manage Company Users" tab. Any party who wishes to be heard in response or opposition to the Court's tentative ruling MUST NOTIFY the Court's Judicial Assistant by telephone at (707) 521-6893 and MUST NOTIFY all other parties of the intent to appear, and whether they will appear in person or by Zoom.